With preliminary product vision and research, Dwellci AI is struggling with a functional MVP to validate concepts and test out user feedback.
The Solution
As the only designer on the team, I built key flows and AI features to support project and study creation, as well as AI model generation and optimization. The MVP received 4.88/5 in preliminary user testing.
Dwellci AI
An AI-led Transformation of “How Architects Might Work?”
Architects are known to go through complex development stages, where they gather client and site requirements, brainstorm multiple ideas, explore feasibility, and hop onto different softwares like AutoCAD, Revit, Rhino to create polished models and rendering.
AI is coming in to change how they work. Starting with Dwellci AI, aiming to empower the early conception phase with AI — making the process faster and freer.
The Problem
How might we guide users to input data for AI generated models?
The Challenge
AI generated models depend on data input, such as site information, building programs, as well as potential constraints like construction codes. In a study creation process, I needed to figure out a way for this process to go smoothly and intuitively.
Gathering AI generation model requirements
Through analyzing the workflow of a building construction, competitive analysis, and consultation with the founder, I realized there are 4 essential steps before a model can be generated by AI.
Comparing user-AI interaction flows
With the information about model building, I explored multiple flows of inputting information and generating models with AI. Their main differences lies in how our AI model can understand user input and transfer that input into precise models.
Flow 1 — Only input programs -> AI generates model -> User adds constraints
Flow 2 — Input constraints + metrics -> AI generates model ✅ (Dev efficient & user effective)
Flow 3 — User directly describes models -> AI generates model -> User edits
Guiding Users through the Process
Based on the flow, the user data input flow was divided into 3 key stages, with more details at each stage.
Feature—Scalable Site Selection
Users can select their building site for once, and repetitively build studies on the same site.
Feature—Guided User Input and AI Models
Data input are divided into multiple categories for easy input and simplified onboarding.
Current User Problems with Complex Workflows
Jumping back and forth between different softwares cause a few issues in architects’ development process: it takes extra time importing and exporting files in different softwares, sometimes having to recreate details caused by incompatibility. Besides, keeping track of different files and manually updating one view due the change in another view adds to the extra work.
Switching Smoothly between Views & Metrics
As a result, I optimized the mid-fi wireframe into the features of a universal view switch bar and metrics reference panel.
Architecture software usage guide: archimash.com/articles/architecture-software-guide/
How might we integrate multiple workflows into one solution?
The Challenge
Currently, architects juggle with multiple software to process different types of files, including 2D floor plans, data files, 3D models, and client requirements. To streamline their workflow, the challenge here is to reduce steps and provides integrated solutions.
Exploring Best Integration Structure
Jumping back and forth between different softwares cause a few issues in architects’ development process: it takes extra time importing and exporting files in different softwares, sometimes having to recreate details caused by incompatibility. Besides, keeping track of different files and manually updating one view due the change in another view adds to the extra work.
Feature—Real-time Updated Views & Metrics
Users can switch between different views originally achieved on multiple softwares, and enjoy real-time synchronized data between different model changes.
Feature—Chat with AI to Modify Models
Users can chat with AI to describe what changes they want to make to the model, and select between different versions of changes to finalize a concept.
Shipping the MVP
Achieving a 4.88/5 Customer Satisfaction Score (CSAT)
We engaged in interviews with 20+ potential customers, generating a high score of 4.88/5 CSAT.
Design System: Core Components
I created a design system for the MVP, including key interaction components.
Shipping the interactive prototypes
I shipped the interactive prototypes with specs to the dev team.
The End. Redirecting you to…
Funsport Kiosk
Outdoor Navigation
Craft Community